Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #8576: "sur parolle" should be "sur parole"

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #8576: "sur parolle" should be "sur parole"
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-16 16:53:23

#8576: "sur parolle" should be "sur parole"
------------------------------------------------------+---------------------
  Reporter:  Akim Demaille <akim.demaille@…>          |       Owner:  viboes  
      Type:  Bugs                                     |      Status:  assigned
 Milestone:  To Be Determined                         |   Component:  thread  
   Version:  Boost 1.52.0                             |    Severity:  Cosmetic
Resolution:                                           |    Keywords:          
------------------------------------------------------+---------------------

Comment (by viboes):

 The expression is in the context "take his word for it".

 The difference between the traits is_recursive_mutex and
 is_recursive_mute_sur_parole, is that the first can be verify some
 interface usage while the second states something that is not verifiable
 at compile time, and we need to take their word for it.

 I'm open to suggestion on how to name these traits.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8576#comment:6>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.