Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #6356: [boost::serialization] Document the use of boost::serialization::throw_exception()

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #6356: [boost::serialization] Document the use of boost::serialization::throw_exception()
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-28 18:46:49


#6356: [boost::serialization] Document the use of
boost::serialization::throw_exception()
------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
  Reporter: adishavit@… | Owner: ramey
      Type: Bugs | Status: closed
 Milestone: To Be | Component: serialization
  Determined | Severity: Problem
   Version: Boost 1.48.0 | Keywords: serialization, throw_exception
Resolution: wontfix |
------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by ramey):

 * status: new => closed
 * resolution: => wontfix

Comment:

 boost::serialization::throw_exception() is part of somewhat tottered
 history.

 a) originally it was boost::throw_exception(). This was designed to
 funnel all exceptions through a central point so that the could be handled
 in accordance with the available support for exceptions. That is
 boost::throw_exception() would be defined to use throw if the system
 supported while it might be defined as something else if the system didn't
 support exceptions - or if the developer using the library didn't want to
 support exceptions.

 b) Along came the boost exception library to improve support for
 exceptions in application. It was subjected to the boost review process
 and was accepted on the basis if two (I think) positive reviews. It was
 then upload into the boost development tree.

 c) Part of boost exception was to redefine boost::throw_exception for a
 purpose totally different than the original one. Now it added the
 facilities to any library which had previously had depended upon
 boost::throw_exception. This added a whole bunch of templated code where
 non had existed before and (temporarily) broke a bunch of library code.
 As this occurred "under the radar" it was really annoying. It also meant
 that one's library (serialization) had a whole new dependency and included
 a bunch of code which the library itself never used.

 d) In spite of objections raised by a number of library authors, the
 changes were not rolled back. Our only choice was to re-implement
 boost::throw_exception as (in my case boost::serialization::throw
 exception). Which is what I did.

 So that is how we came the stuck with this problem.

 In your case, you can use any thing you want to throw an exception and it
 will work fine.

 If you want to prepare text to document all of the above to include in the
 documentation, I would consider adding it to the documentation. Meanwhile
 I'm going to close this ticket.

 Thanks for your interest.

 Robert Ramey

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6356#comment:2>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:50:15 UTC