Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #9772: [libs/context] make_i386_sysv_elf_gas.S:52: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #9772: [libs/context] make_i386_sysv_elf_gas.S:52: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-03-18 19:07:33

#9772: [libs/context] make_i386_sysv_elf_gas.S:52: Error: invalid instruction
suffix for `pop'
--------------------------------------+------------------------
  Reporter:  ad@…                     |      Owner:  olli
      Type:  Bugs                     |     Status:  reopened
 Milestone:  To Be Determined         |  Component:  context
   Version:  Boost Development Trunk  |   Severity:  Regression
Resolution:                           |   Keywords:
--------------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by class101 <ad@…>):

 I'm trying deeper with an untested set

 toolset=gcc target-os=darwin linker-type=darwin address-model=32_64
 architecture=x86 (gcc-4.2.1)

 but this one doesn't seem to work, the produced libs are not multiarch,
 been searching around it seems someone works around with lipo but not sure
 it is worth working on this, anyway just sharing my links if you are
 interested in looking to gcc-5666.3 (4.2.1) and combined support:
 http://www.implbits.com/About/Blog/tabid/78/post/building-with-gcc-4-6-on-

 osx/Default.aspx

 I doubt I will be using multiarch libs here anyway, I prefer to stick with
 gcc for all the three targeted arch rather than switching to clang just
 for the purpose of using multiarch

 Anyway let me know if you happen to need so test build here I have
 compilers ready here

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/9772#comment:17>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.