Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #10767: Regression of #10296 when address-model=32 in mingw

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #10767: Regression of #10296 when address-model=32 in mingw
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-07 07:21:52

#10767: Regression of #10296 when address-model=32 in mingw
---------------------------------------+------------------------
  Reporter:  Brian Jack <gau_veldt@…>  |      Owner:  anthonyw
      Type:  Bugs                      |     Status:  new
 Milestone:  To Be Determined          |  Component:  thread
   Version:  Boost 1.57.0              |   Severity:  Regression
Resolution:                            |   Keywords:
---------------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by Brian Jack <gau_veldt@…>):

 I have some upstream libraries that will not work in 64-bit build so I had
 to build boost as a 32-bit target (project-config.jam set to using gcc and
 build command from the cmd shell is: b2 address-model=32 install).

 This all works fine and dandy, except that it causes a regression of the
 whole #10296 _InterlockedCompareExchange and friends related issues.

 You guessed it, it hits the ifdef(MINGW64_VERSION_MAJOR) defines, finds
 them defined (we are in address-model=32 remember) and happily creates the
 underscored forms of the calls in the implementation blobs and the linker
 happily complains (AGAIN ARGHHHH!) that they are not defined.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/10767#comment:1>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.