Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #10767: Regression of #10296 when address-model=32 in mingw

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #10767: Regression of #10296 when address-model=32 in mingw
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-17 01:04:35

#10767: Regression of #10296 when address-model=32 in mingw
---------------------------------------+------------------------
  Reporter:  Brian Jack <gau_veldt@…>  |      Owner:  ned14
      Type:  Bugs                      |     Status:  new
 Milestone:  To Be Determined          |  Component:  thread
   Version:  Boost 1.57.0              |   Severity:  Regression
Resolution:                            |   Keywords:
---------------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by ned14):

 Replying to [comment:11 Brian Jack <gau_veldt@…>]:
 >
 > the problem does not happen on build
 > it happens when attempting to link any program using boost.thread

 I also compiled and linked and executed a full unit test suite using 32
 bit mingw-w64, all of which is dynamically linked to boost.thread. If
 there were any unresolved symbols, they surely would have appeared then.

 Can you provide a small example piece of code which demonstrates this
 problem please? Posting copy and pastes from a large project we don't have
 isn't useful. For all we know, this is a bug in GCC 4.7 Mingw's and has
 since been fixed. This stackoverflow post in fact
 (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18134148/undefined-reference-to-

 interlockedcompareexchange-with-boost-thread-on-mingw64) says this is
 exactly the problem, and a newer mingw-w64 doesn't have this problem.

 Niall

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/10767#comment:13>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.