[Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #10935: Header-only option for Boost.Timer

Subject: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #10935: Header-only option for Boost.Timer
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-15 22:21:21


#10935: Header-only option for Boost.Timer
------------------------------+------------------------
 Reporter: barendgehrels | Owner: bemandawes
     Type: Feature Requests | Status: new
Milestone: To Be Determined | Component: timer
  Version: Boost 1.57.0 | Severity: Problem
 Keywords: |
------------------------------+------------------------
 As discussed on the Mailing List:



> So as far as I understand, Boost.Test has moved from Boost.Timer v1
 (2001)
> to Boost.Timer v2 (2011). Boost.Timer v2 depends on Boost.Chrono, which
> optionally can be compiled header-only, and on Boost.System. But
 Boost.Timer
> itself has no option to be compiled header-only (AFAIU). So basically
 the
> regression is in Boost.Timer, which now requires linking. But because
 that
> is already introduced in 2011, it cannot be called a sudden regression.
> However, the influence on Boost.Test is quite large.
>
> We use Boost.Test (the header-only option) since 2007 and wish to keep
 it
> header-only. I know what to do to make it compile (link with
 Boost.Timer)
> but that is an unwished option for several reasons, so: a regression.

 I looked a Boost.Timer, and it seems reasonable to add a header-only
 option.

 If you open a ticket, I'll give it a try. But it will be a week or
 two, so a ticket is best.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/10935>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-02-16 18:50:17 UTC