Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #11756: boost.Test: non standards compliant use of FE_* macros (unable to compile boost test library on FPU-less arches)

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #11756: boost.Test: non standards compliant use of FE_* macros (unable to compile boost test library on FPU-less arches)
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-12 10:14:34

#11756: boost.Test: non standards compliant use of FE_* macros (unable to compile
boost test library on FPU-less arches)
----------------------------------+------------------------
  Reporter:  bartosz.krasinski@…  |      Owner:  renficiaud
      Type:  Patches              |     Status:  reopened
 Milestone:  Boost 1.64.0         |  Component:  test
   Version:  Boost 1.59.0         |   Severity:  Problem
Resolution:                       |   Keywords:
----------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by renficiaud):

 I also agree that the problem seems to rather be on the side of uLibC
 right now. So what I suggest is to mimic the behavior of [#comment:52] by
 adding this

 {{{
 // ...
   #if !defined(BOOST_NO_FENV_H) && !defined(BOOST_CLANG) && \
       defined(__GLIBC__) && defined(__USE_GNU) && \
       !(defined(__UCLIBC__) || defined(__nios2__) ||
 defined(__microblaze__))
   #define BOOST_TEST_FPE_SUPPORT_WITH_GLIBC_EXTENSIONS__
   #endif
 // ...
 }}}

 like it was done for boost 1.61. This has the advantage to not define
 ```BOOST_NO_FENV_H``` and focus the macro on the glibC extensions
 availability.

 Can you quickly test the branch ```topic/11756-ulibc-disabling``` ?

 Thanks

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/11756#comment:58>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.