Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #12328: Clarify which Boost Config headers should not be included directly

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #12328: Clarify which Boost Config headers should not be included directly
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-20 15:09:49


#12328: Clarify which Boost Config headers should not be included directly
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
  Reporter: Tony Lewis | Owner: johnmaddock
  <tonyelewis@…> | Status: closed
      Type: Feature Requests | Component: config
 Milestone: To Be Determined | Severity: Problem
   Version: Boost 1.61.0 | Keywords:
Resolution: fixed | header,detail,dependency,implementation,interface,optional,config
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by Tony Lewis <TonyELewis@…>):

 Great. Thanks very much.

 Is this going to cause a lot of breakage for other Boost libraries that
 have been including Boost Config headers that they shouldn't have been? If
 so, are you able to notify them to give them a heads-up? On the
 developers' mailing list?

 Again: thanks very much.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/12328#comment:2>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-04-20 15:13:45 UTC