Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #13099: How about adding BOOST_CONSEXPR to functions in rational where appropriate

Subject: Re: [Boost-bugs] [Boost C++ Libraries] #13099: How about adding BOOST_CONSEXPR to functions in rational where appropriate
From: Boost C++ Libraries (noreply_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-27 03:56:36

#13099: How about adding BOOST_CONSEXPR to functions in rational where appropriate
-------------------------------+--------------------------------
  Reporter:  ramey             |      Owner:  dlwalker
      Type:  Feature Requests  |     Status:  new
 Milestone:  To Be Determined  |  Component:  rational
   Version:  Boost 1.63.0      |   Severity:  Optimization
Resolution:                    |   Keywords:  rational constexpr
-------------------------------+--------------------------------
Changes (by ramey):

 * owner:  johnmaddock => dlwalker

Comment:

 Hmmm - I looked at the code and it seems I over reacted.  Many of the
 functions are constexpr.  The particular one I was interested in isn't.
 This function is operator * (..  The way it's implemented in terms of *=
 inhibits it from being constexpr.  Perhaps the implementation might be
 tweaked to over come this.

--
Ticket URL: <https://svn.boost.org/trac10/boost/ticket/13099#comment:1>
Boost C++ Libraries <http://www.boost.org/>
Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.