Re: [jamboost] GLOB implemented; what to do with it?

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-08 08:59:02

David Abrahams wrote:
> 1. I didn't realize you were just hijacking existing glob code in Jam. In
> that case, I have no objections.

Good. I need think about how directories should be handled, thought.

> 2. These diffs seem to include fixes for "end-of-list" indexing. Didn't I
> already add that patch?

Sure. The 'cvs diff' was run in a working copy where 'cvs up' was not run 
since 'end-of-list' indexing was fixed. Actually, this diff also contains 
support for "rpm" building in Jamfile. I did not meant it as a patch file to 
be immediately applied to the CVS -- I'll clean things later.

- Volodya