From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-17 11:42:36
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:38 AM
Subject: [jamboost] os.path module
> This is a minor technical question, but we'd need to agree on it, as
> are everywhere. Would it be OK if we just represents pathes everywhere as
> list of tokens, with "." denoting special case of empty path.
If by lists of paths, you mean:
path = foo bar baz ; # => foo/bar/baz
Then no, I can't agree. It's too limiting because you often need several
paths in a single list:
paths = foo/bar baz/mumble ;
> Would it be OK
> if we assume that pathes are always "simplified" and work with them only
> using rules in os.path?
That was my intention, depending on your meaning of "simplified".
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk