Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-28 12:40:43

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [jamboost] Development plan"
Previous message: jamboost_at_[hidden]: "New file uploaded to jamboost"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "test-development"

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>

> Richard Geiger take not:
oops, "note"----------^^^

> Interestingly, these changes seem to show that the FAIL_EXPECTED Jam
> extension is unneccessary as long as we have the extended NOCARE semantics
> for targets with build actions. If this proves to be the case we should
> throw out FAIL_EXPECTED.
>
> -Dave

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [jamboost] Development plan"
Previous message: jamboost_at_[hidden]: "New file uploaded to jamboost"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "test-development"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk