From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-06 01:16:31
On 2002-02-06 at 01:08 AM, david.abrahams_at_[hidden] (David Abrahams) wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>
>> On 2002-02-06 at 02:35 AM, bmosher_at_[hidden]
>> (bmosher_at_crosswinds_dot_net) wrote:
>> >Hello all,
>> >[I don't check this email address very frequently, so please direct
>> >any replies to the list only -- thanks.]
>> >One of the targets in my tree cannot be linked against the static
>> >runtime library. Is there an easy way to suppress this
>> >target/subvariant combination from building during those times that I
>> >build the rest of the tree "<runtime-link>dynamic"?
>This makes no sense to me. If the target can't be linked against the static
>runtime, and you don't want to build it when you specify the dynamic
>runtime, when /would/ you build it?
>....and why wouldn't use just put <runtime-link>dynamic in the target
>I'm really confused about wher this is headed.
Now I'm also confused... I missed the discrepancy initially... I really
shouldn't post after having some drinks :-\ So the question is what is Brian
specifying that is causing the target to get built against the static runtime?
So Brian could post an example of what you are doing that is causing you
-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk