From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-26 12:11:56
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 17:26, Rene Rivera wrote:
> On 2002-02-26 at 11:10 AM, david.abrahams_at_[hidden] (David Abrahams) wrote:
> >----- Original Message -----
> >No, they're really different features. Thomas' feature could, for example,
> >be used to specify the build requirements for Boost.Python modules, but
> > one should still be able to build any module in any of the variants
And the modules can can choose their template too.
> But, to me using the variant matches more closely to what MSVC,
> CodeWarrior, and other IDEs do (although CW doesn't have inherited
I do not know the Metrowerks IDE, but to me MSVC is not really a good example
for clever and easy to handle build settings management.
> >I like his feature in principle and would be interested in seeing some
> >I think "template" isn't the best name. Probably "requirement-set" would
> > be better.
> Yes, to both those statements ;-)
Ok, I will sit down and provide documentation.
With regard to the name. I am not religuos about it. I thought about using
"requirements" but I dropped it as it does not fit if default-build is
integrated. I choose template as it looks like a real target and "dependent"
targets are created by first copying the template.
> -- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
> -- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
> -- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover
voice: +49(0) 511 762 - 4273, fax: +49(0) 511 762-3001
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk