From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-28 09:11:43
At 03:39 PM 2/27/2002, bill_kempf wrote:
>Yes. Now I guess the point (beyond the link bug in the build system
>for <dll>) is that I think a build section/rule variable should be
>included in the regression tests. It's important that I be able to
>insure the various subvariants compile, link, and pass runtime
>tests. This will become more important if I can turn pthread-win32
>support into a variant on Windows platforms.
Just FYI, I'm working on moving the official regression tests over to the
jam version. Once the Win32 versions of all the pieces are working, I'll
let others know so they can try it on other systems.
I've got a draft version running of a program to generate the HTML status
tables from the residue left by the jamming the status/Jamfile.
Part of this project is also to make sure that the new version of
Boost.Test (which needs an object library) works well enough to merge into
the main trunk.
Thanks to Dave Abrahams for dealing with several status/Jamfile issues
which have come up during initial testing.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk