From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-28 11:40:26
On 2002-02-28 at 11:25 AM, david.abrahams_at_[hidden] (David Abrahams) wrote:
>IMO Thomas is on the right track; if you really want a global requirement
>set it would make just as much sense to use a global variable.
I don't need a global requirement set. Mostly I was thinking that
variant/requirements/build directives should mirror each other, not just in
syntax but in semantics.
And I thought we we're trying to move away from variables in general. I know
this is going to be disposable code when V2 gets done. But I think getting an
idea of "good" practice now is also important.
-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk