Re: [jamboost] <lib> broken?

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-15 23:23:12

Oh, it happens this way regardless of self-recursion?
That's novel; the original code would re-include for dependencies on
demand.
Slightly more efficient in some cases, but not importantly so. This sort
of thing is one big reason v2 will use a declarative approach.

-Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>
To: <jamboost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [jamboost] <lib> broken?

> On 2002-03-15 at 10:16 PM, david.abrahams_at_[hidden] (David Abrahams)
wrote:
>
> >Without too much deep thought, that sounds correct to me.
>
> OK, fixed the problem. Jamfiles are now included exactly twice, once
as
> dependencies, and then for generation.
>
>
> -- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
> -- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
> -- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor ---------------------~-->
> Tiny Wireless Camera under $80!
> Order Now! FREE VCR Commander!
> Click Here - Only 1 Day Left!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/nuyOHD/7.PDAA/yigFAA/z3wwlB/TM
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------~
->
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> jamboost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>