From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-29 10:50:40
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>
> >1. What's the condition of the new startup code, Rene?
> It's getting there. Which is why I notice the module bug. I will be
> it maybe tonight, definitely in the weekend.
> >2. What would prevent us from moving it to the main trunk?
> >I don't mind adding a boost-build.jam to the boost tree, and/or
> >people that if they check out and rebuild jam there are new
> >for use
> Don't know if these would prevent, but it would require, at minimum,
> some of the "new" stuff into the trunk
> have to see how to make the new load procedure load the V1 system
Oh, I'm sorry; what I meant was: "what would prevent us from moving the
Jambase changes to the main trunk?"
However, it might in fact make more sense to try to move the whole thing
across to the main trunk. Anything to help eliminate the schism between
the old and new code, IMO... so, I suggest you spend a *little* time
thinking about whether that can be done. If it can't, just find a way to
move the Jambase.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk