From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-10 04:55:38
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>
> > Since I know we're
> > going to have to use paths as arguments to pseudo-function
> > guess I'm starting to lean towards this syntax:
> > function<arg1><arg2><arg3>.
> Looks clean. Need to try it in practice.
We could also use
function<arg1|arg2|arg3>. Slightly nicer.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk