Re: [jamboost] Tastes like checkin

From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-02 10:21:43

On 2002-05-02 at 01:08 PM, toon.knapen_at_[hidden] (Toon Knapen) wrote:

>On Wednesday 01 May 2002 21:43, David Abrahams wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Toon Knapen" <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]>
>>
>> > meaning we should update the prebuilt jam's on the web or are you
>>
>> talking of
>>
>> > v2 (I'm not sure about it's compatibility with the current system)
>>
>> Both. I checked in v2 changes as well as changes to the core jam
>> executable.
>>
>> The new stuff is mostly needed for v2, but I have purposely limited the
>> v2 jam features used in v1 in order to avoid causing people problems.
>> However, it's time to get everyone using an up-to-date jam. We can make
>> their lives /so/ much easier even with v1 by taking advantage of the
>> built-in GLOB rule to do some auto-configuration. Furthermore, there are
>> some windows-specific fixes in the current jam source which everyone
>> should have. An update is long overdue.
>
>I just updated the prebuilt execs for IBM, SGI, OSF(Tru64), Solaris,
Linuxx86 
>from the tools/build/jam_src in the CVS. As a bonus I added HP (never
managed 
>to get a working version on HP but this time it worked out of the box)
>I also updated the webpage in the CVS to reflect the addition of HPUX.
>
>BTW, what's the bjam executable (that apparantly is a hard-link to the 
>jam-executable) ?
>
>So all our unix platforms are covered but not the windowze one.

Dave, Did you also merge the RPM package info?

-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]