Fw: [boost] CVS branched: RC_1_28_0

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-10 03:40:10

Hmm, is Jamrules still relevant? Yes, apparently.
Yikes, I just realized that it has a bunch of flotsam in it, some which
even seems dangerous.
I've just cleaned it out on the RC_1_28_0 branch, and updated the version
number to 1.28.0.

FYI, Rene, you might want to query someone more Unix-oriented than Beman
about whether to make version-number-related changes ;-)

-D

----- Original Message -----
From: "David LeBlanc" <whisper_at_[hidden]>

> Sorry - Jamrules of 03/02/2002
>
> David LeBlanc
> Seattle, WA USA
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> > [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of David Abrahams
> >
> > Please explain what you mean; there is no file boost/jamfiles in the
boost
> > CVS.
> >
> > -Dave
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "David LeBlanc" <whisper_at_[hidden]>
> >
> > > so does boost/jamfiles
> > >
> > > David LeBlanc
> > > Seattle, WA USA
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> > > > [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Rene Rivera
> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 15:12
> > > > On 2002-05-09 at 02:27 PM, bdawes_at_[hidden] (Beman Dawes) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >So,
> > > > >
> > > > >We have just short of a week to fix glitches before the release,
> > > > but those
> > > > >waiting for the branch are now free to commit changes which will
> > > > not appear
> > > > >in the release.
> > > >
> > > > Beman... boost/version.hpp still has the 1.27.0 version number.