Re: [jamboost] Fw: [boost] CVS branched: RC_1_28_0

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-10 09:52:17

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>
To: <jamboost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [jamboost] Fw: [boost] CVS branched: RC_1_28_0

> On 2002-05-10 at 03:40 AM, david.abrahams_at_[hidden] (David Abrahams) wrote:
> -----------------^^^^^^^-- were you really up that late or is a clock
messed
> up somewhere.
>
> >Hmm, is Jamrules still relevant? Yes, apparently.
> >Yikes, I just realized that it has a bunch of flotsam in it, some which
> >even seems dangerous.
> >I've just cleaned it out on the RC_1_28_0 branch, and updated the
version
> >number to 1.28.0.
>
> OK. But I don't see any changes in the branch, or the trunk.

...because I hadn't checked it in ;-) fixed, now.

> >FYI, Rene, you might want to query someone more Unix-oriented than Beman
> >about whether to make version-number-related changes ;-)
>
> I didn't think this was Unix oriented. After all it's just the version
> number. Isn't he the one driving those?

Doesn't it also affect the SONAME for GCC?