From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-11 08:39:35
----- Original Message -----
From: "Toon Knapen" <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]>
> would'nt it be easier to just provide the jam executable and specify in
> doc that you need to rename or link it to bjam if one wants v2 behaviour.
> It's kinda overkill to put two identical execs on the web.
The Unix distro just makes a link. At best we should provide only "bjam".
> Is there any noticeable difference from the user point of view btw ?
Yes, no need to specify -sBOOST_ROOT=...
Hmm, maybe we should remove the special hacks which
accomodate -sBOOST_ROOT=... to invoke v1 behavior from the command-line,
and just distribute "bjam".
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk