Re: [jamboost] Re: Building boost on the RC_1_28_0 branch

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-17 09:23:52

----- Original Message -----
From: "Markus Schöpflin" <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]>

> David Abrahams wrote:
> >
> > Well, runtime-link-dynamic should stay, but otherwise I agree.
>
> Why? Because I haven't stated it explicitly in my variant?

Yes. And the built-in variants are designed that way.

> >
> > Feel free to submit a patch...
>
> I will have a try at it...

OK. Be warned that we will try not to waste much time on v1, which means
that if it doesn't work right away, you may not get much help fixing it.
However, if you'd like to help with v2, we'd be more than grateful!

-Dave