Re: [jamboost] Timestamps

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-05 07:23:34

I have no idea.
-Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Markus Scherschanski" <mscherschanski_at_[hidden]>
To: <jamboost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:12 AM
Subject: [jamboost] Timestamps

> Does Jam handle this Bug between NTFS and FAT ??? (look at quotation)
>
> "Fat file systems, as used by Windows 95, can only store time-stamps to
the
> nearest 2 seconds and this can cause problems when comparing with files
> stored on an NTFS file system as used by Windows NT4, which maintains
> time-stamps to an accuracy of milli-seconds."
> It's seems to be a common problem while copying/making libraries and
> confuses most makes.
> If not, we should implement this.
> Regards,
> Markus
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> jamboost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>