From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-05 07:23:34
I have no idea.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Markus Scherschanski" <mscherschanski_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:12 AM
Subject: [jamboost] Timestamps
> Does Jam handle this Bug between NTFS and FAT ??? (look at quotation)
> "Fat file systems, as used by Windows 95, can only store time-stamps to
> nearest 2 seconds and this can cause problems when comparing with files
> stored on an NTFS file system as used by Windows NT4, which maintains
> time-stamps to an accuracy of milli-seconds."
> It's seems to be a common problem while copying/making libraries and
> confuses most makes.
> If not, we should implement this.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk