From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-27 10:02:50
I don't think it would be bad to investigate, but I think actually doing it
is non-trivial. Note also that because our support for modules introduced
stack frames, I doubt Perforce would ever pick up the modification.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:16 AM
Subject: [jamboost] Jam's "return" oddity.
> As you probably know, Jam's "return" statement does not return, but
> remembers its argument as rule exit status. It constantly makes me wrap
> inside if/else block when all I want is to quickly handle some corner
> a rule beginning. I plan to investigate if "return" can be fixed. Do you
> think it's a good idea?
> - Volodya
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk