From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-28 07:51:28
David Abrahams wrote:
> > Okay with me.
> > But... Can we handle command line arguments? Won't they be
> > treated as target names by jam?
> It's easy enough to cause the argument to be turned into a NOTFILE target
> with no special updating actions.
Heck! It's not that easy. For example
Yes, we can create NOTFILE target called "debug" but jam will then try to
update only that target, instread of updating all, which is desired. I can
suggest these solutions
1. Make targets like "debug" depend on "all" if there are no explicit targets
in the command line.
2. Introduce new "TOUCH" builtin and apply it to the "all" target is there
are no explicit targets in the command line.
3. Introduce new variable, say "TARGETS_TO_UPDATE". Initialize them from
command line as usual. When running updating actions, consult this variable.
This way, Jam code will be able to modify the set of target that should be
I think approach 3 is the most reasonable. All others looks more like ugly
workarounds to me. What do you think?
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk