Re: [jamboost] container.jam question

From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-02 11:30:00

[2002-07-02] Vladimir Prus wrote:

>Rene Rivera wrote:
>> Getting at subelements is bit tricky, but jam doesn't have an easy way
:-(
>>
>> l0 = [ $(l).at 0 ] ;
>> ECHO [ $(l0).at 0 ] ; # >> 1
>
>Can we make this work without second level lists? 
>
> l0 = [ $(l).at 0 ] ;
> ECHO $(l0[1]) ;
>
>I'm quite happy with jam lists, and most rules now take jam lists. Second 
>level list is a little bit overkill for my task.

The closest you can get to that is:

$(l0) = $($(l).self.value[1]) ;
ECHO $($(l0).self.value[1]) ;

I think that will work. Maybe Dave has some better syntax up his sleeve when
it comes to class'es ;-)

-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]