From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-05 09:19:35
Maybe it would best to use separate rules for separate purposes? That
increases the ability to check for errors and reduces confusion, IMO.
maybe, project and extern-project?
or, project and project-id?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 8:50 AM
Subject: [jamboost] The "project" rule
> it was discussed some time ago that rule called "project" be used in two
> slightly different ways:
> - to assign project id and some attributes to the current project
> - to declare id for some other project that we're going to use.
> I've an interface question. Would it be OK to require that the second
> use this syntax
> project boost : jamfile-location /home/ghost/Work/boost ;
> This is the simplest way to disambiguate. Does anybody consider
> "jamfile-location" too verbose?
> - Volodya
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk