From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-10 02:01:47
David Abrahams wrote:
> > I'm writing property.make helper rule which will take care of
> > implicit values.
> There's already feature.expand-subfeatures. Doesn't that do what you want?
Oh... I'd never thought "expand-subfeatures" has anything to do with implicit
values, but the comment says it does. The "property.make" rule is more
convenient, thought --- it takes several properties at once.
> P.S. I'm not very happy with the module names and division of
> responsibility between feature.jam and property.jam. Maybe property.jam
> should be renamed property-set.jam and some of the functionality moved
I'm not sure. I've posted another desktop note about that, but, frankly, I'm
not likely to consider this soon.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk