From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-16 07:04:05
David Abrahams wrote:
> > > So then you'd like me to write a rationale about why define is a
> > > non-propagated feature?
> > I'd rather you answer the original question. Or you think the user will
> > not
> > wonder?
> I don't think the user will wonder why we have a rule that a features with
> the "non-propagated" attribute are not propagated.
> Different individual features will have their own reasons for not
> propagating. I could discuss "define" specifically, but that's not really a
> motivation for why non-propagated features work the way they do...
> not-trying-to-be-difficult-ly y'rs,
Ohh.... let's postpone this question -- it can't seem to explain why I think
it's important. Can you comment on my other email instread?
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk