Re: [jamboost] Re: msvc-tools.jam question

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-19 06:37:05

If you have the neccessary documentation pages, per what we've already got
for the other toolsets, I'm interested and will be happy to integrate them.
-Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "rogeeff" <rogeeff_at_[hidden]>
To: <jamboost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 3:01 AM
Subject: [jamboost] Re: msvc-tools.jam question

> >
> > * The status/Jamfile.
>
> As I mentioned before I don't think it is a good idea to keep all
> regretion test in one file. It would be better orginized if each
> library test directory (or roor directory if test is missing) would
> have Jamfile that has target test. status/Jamfile will have only one
> rule that will traverce through all the libraries and invoke testing.
>
> > --Beman
>
> Gennadiy.
>
> P.S. I have got sunpro and sunpto-stlport toolsets implementations.
> They probably need a final look from experts but, they works for me.
> Does anybody is interested?
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> jamboost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>