From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-22 12:10:04
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> This is very slow! It essentially means that if I switch from using jam
> list to using contaner.vector in one place, I'll have 100x slowdown.
> Actually... it seems worse than that: each construction of class causes a
> call to BACKTRACE and that rule returns the list of all stack frames -- I
> suspect a quadratic running time is possible.
And regardless of way we use classes, quardratic running time seems terrible
idea to me. I've added a new optional parameter, 'levels' to the BACKTRACE
rule. Now class.jam calls it as [ BACKTRACE 1 ], so there's no more quadratic
time. For my test case, this reduces the running time from
6.3/5.3 secons (real/user time) to 4/3.4
Gonna commit the change soon.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk