From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-24 07:22:09
I just want to say: you have my admiration and gratitude for pressing
forward with this. Thanks, you rule!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>
To: <jamboost_at_[hidden]>; "Markus Sch?pflin"
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: [jamboost] Building the dependency graph
> Hi Markus,
> Markus Schöpflin wrote (long ago):
> > Ok, here we go...
> > Use case for various compiler tools from microsoft.
> > [snip]
> Ok, now I'm looking at your diagram, which is now part of
> to see what problems it presents for us.
> I've some initial questions, and would appreciate if you could clarify
> 1. Is *.bsc file created for each executable file, or for the whole
> 2. Is creation of precompiled headers an explicit operation? I.e. would
> reasonable to require something like:
> precompiled_headers my_project_pch : stdafx.cpp ;
> 3. How files compiled with and without precompiled headers are separated?
> we assume that sources for each main target all either use PCH or don't
> them. That would allow to write
> lib a : a.cpp ;
> lib b : b.cpp my_project_pch ;
> Or is finer granularity required?
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk