Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Steven Kirk (steven.kirk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-06 08:17:17

Next message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Status of boost.function on Borland C++"
Previous message: Markus Schöpflin : "Re: Passing an argument to the linker"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Re: Passing an argument to the linker"
Next in thread: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Status of boost.function on Borland C++"
Reply: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Status of boost.function on Borland C++"

Hi,

Could you let me know the status of the new-style boost.function library on
Borland C++? I realise it is not working at the moment, but is it likely
that the new style will ever work properly on borland, or should I stick to
the boost::functionN variants? As far as I can tell from attempting to get
the latest function.hpp from CVS working, borland does not correctly
recognise function types, but I'm no expert on these matters.

Next message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Status of boost.function on Borland C++"
Previous message: Markus Schöpflin : "Re: Passing an argument to the linker"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Re: Passing an argument to the linker"
Next in thread: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Status of boost.function on Borland C++"
Reply: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Status of boost.function on Borland C++"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk