Re: [jamboost] Intel-win32 problems with Boost.Thread

From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-08 17:31:08

[2002-08-08] David Abrahams wrote:

>From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>
>
>> But the most likely culprit from a quick look might be this line in
>> intel-win32-tools.jam:
>>
>> flags intel-win32 RUN_PATH : "$(INTEL_PATH)"\\Bin ;
>>
>> Why is that line there?
>
>It's there because that's where the intel installation keeps its dynamic
>libraries, and it needs to be in the PATH when we run tests that are linked
>to the dynamic runtime.
>
>Don't remove that line lightly!

Ahh, yes, got it :-)

So the question is wether the gRUN_PATH is or isn't getting merged correctly
into the RUN_PATH?

Beman, what does the "PATH=" say in this faulty case?

-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]