Re: [jamboost] Progress on issue 578618: Leave jamfile modules for user.

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-12 04:51:36

Rene Rivera wrote:

> >Seems like this is almost equvivalent in verbosity -- only your approach
> >requires to keep some objects in Jamfile modules, while my does not.
>
> True, but I already had one. And a rule to do the job already. I guess it
> seems to make sense only if it's something the user is going to call, as it
> is for project-root, but not for project attributes.

Yea, I think I agree.

- Volodya