From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-04 11:34:09
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am willing to make the change, but there are a few questions left.
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 17:34, David Abrahams wrote:
> From: "Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]>
> Not if there are enough of them. Remember, this is a piecemeal action.
> Also, note the 'updated' attribute, which means that only changed files
> will go in the command line. Of course, since we're now using command
> files, this is irrelevant.
Furthermore the commandfile contains _not_ only updated files.
> > problems. With Intel6 and VC.NET it looks as if sometimes old code from
> > libA.lib is preferred over new code from the object files.
> That *is* a problem.
What makes me feel uncomfortable is that I can't believe this went unnoticed
for so long.
> This logic was taken directly from the Perforce Jambase:
> actions updated together piecemeal Archive
> if exist $(<) set _$(<:B)_=$(<)
> $(AR) /out:$(<) %_$(<:B)_% $(>)
IIUC they need to do this, the action will only be invoked for updated object
files. But from my experience this can't work either. I will try to dig in
MSDN might take a day or two.
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover
voice: +49(0) 511 762 - 4273, fax: +49(0) 511 762-3001
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk