From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-10 07:27:42
From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>
> >>You should cd to tools/build/tests/generators-test and say "bjam"
> > Wow! It sure does something (see enclosed). But on my cygwin system it
> > hangs after that.
> > It appears to be putting something bogus in c.cpp (also enclosed).
> I don't see c.cpp attached.
Sorry. Here it is.
> The bogosity may be causes by the difference
> in echo behaviour, I guess.
> >>You can also give a different build request,
> >>for example "bjam release".
> > Nifty! Seems really fast, too. I wonder how it would do with lots of
> > targets (c.f. status/Jamfile)?
> I will be really slow. The reason is simple: the transformation sequence
> will be computed again and again, and that's slow. However, it's also
> simple to cache results -- say, you'll convert WD to CPP once and will
> be chaning only file names after that.
Wow, I just started looking at project-root.jam. This is really ** COOL **,
I'll have to spend some time today analyzing the output and comparing it to
what you've got here in project-root.jam.
Should we move the generator registrations for things like gcc.link into
the corresponding modules?
David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
------=_NextPart_000_08AA_01C258A3.EEB1F9F0 Content-Type: text/plain;
"//" c.ui bin\gcc\debug\threading-single\c.h
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk