From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-15 00:16:26
David Abrahams wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>David Abrahams wrote:
>>I'm bad at writing comments, it seems, either in full or in parts :-)
>>I'll try to explain semantic verbosely.
> Sometimes that's the best answer for the comments, too ;-)
I'm only 30% sure I've understand this sentence. Do you mean that
sometimes, when good comment is needed, verbose explanation of semantic
is the best comment?
>>If you call 'generate' with full property set, in means to build it
>>with those properties.
> By "full property set", do you mean one where all non-optional
> features are represented? Or do you mean something else?
I doesn't matter, taking into consideration the agreement below.
>>For example, this happens when there's a list of properties in the
>>command line, and the abstract target is directly requested.
>>If you call 'generate' with a property set containing only
>><toolset>, it means to build it using the given toolset, and using
> Suggest rephrase: "only <toolset>xxx"
>>some default set of property sets. For example, when called with
>>"<toolset>gcc", a target with default build of "debug release" will
>>build itself with two property sets
>> <toolset>gcc <variant>debug ...
>> <toolset>gcc <variant>release ...
>>Why special treatment for toolset? In V1 default build is done using
>>all available toolsets. In other words, a target with default build
>>"debug" can be build with <toolset>gcc and
>><toolset>borland. Currently, main target's generate simply calls
>>'build-request.expand' with the value of it's default build
>>attribute. And 'build-request.expand' can't return property sets
>>with different values of <toolset>, unless explicit list of
>><toolset> properties is passed to it. I thought this handling of
>>predefined set of toolsets in better done at the high level, not
>>However, do we really need such semantics?
> IMO, no.
>>In general, we don't build two variants unless explicitly
>>asked. Maybe, we can build with "default" toolset, unless asked
>>IE, on my Linux box, "bjam" will build with gcc, and msvc will be
>>used for someone else?
> Total agreement.
> It should probably use user-config.jam and site-config.jam and then
> fall back to platform-specific behavior. On Windows it should probably
> check the registry for known compilers (yes, there's a Jam extension
> for this out there) and auto-select if there's only one, notify
Oh, yes! This simplifies everything dramatically. Now, generate should
be called either with empty property set, or not non-empty. With
non-empty, the target will be just built using those properties.
Otherwise, it will be built with a default set of property sets. For
example, a main target with default build of "debug release" will be
Of course, this set of property sets can be obtained from
[ build-request.expand debug release ]
I'm gonna change build-system.jam and targets.jam accordingly right now.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk