From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-15 02:53:12
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Should <toolset> feature be symmetric. IOW, if "gcc" is default
> toolset for me, should targets be built to
> or to
> ? I think first alternative is preferred --- the shorter paths in
> the most common case, the better. Other opinions?
This is ok as long as the user has the option to enable bin/gcc/debug,
as he might also need bin/acc/debug and /bin/vacpp/debug and so on.
This should be possible for the platform as well, I think. Like
bin/linux/gcc and bin/aix/gcc and bin/sunos/gcc and so on.
> (BTW, it appears that 'symmetric features' are not yet supported,
> although it should be extra easy to implementent)
> - Volodya
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk