Re: [jamboost] Re: runtime-link

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-05 11:10:13

Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Rene Rivera wrote:
>> [2002-12-05] David Abrahams wrote:
>> 
>>>How about
>>>
>>>
>>> <link-to>shared
>>> <link-to>static
>>> <link-to>maximum-static, or <link-to>all-static
>> 
>> 
>> OK by me :-)
>
> I'm probably missing something: will this property still
> affect whether we build static or shared libraries?

Not in the way you indicate below.

> Say I have:
>
> lib a : a.cpp ;
>
> I guess that issuing
>
> bjam link-to=static
>
> If I want to build static version of "a" is
> confusing.

Yes. I'm not trying to have one feature to cover two very different
meanings ;-)

-- 
David Abrahams
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution