Re: [jamboost] Another communication medium?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-05 13:36:05

Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Markus Schöpflin <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>Ok, then let's make two ortogonal features of this. (See my answer to 
>>>Vladimir for details.)
>> 
>> 
>> I'm not certain that's what we want, but maybe it is. It might work if
>> Vladimir's "link everything static" feature is a composite which
>> includes the "static runtime" property... which of course would be
>> overridden by any explicit specification of runtime link preference.
>> 
>
> I've already said that this is very nice idea.
>
> The problem, however, is that I've recieved Markus message that Dave was
> responding 20 mins after recieving the reply. I wonder if some real-time
> communication medium might be better for brainstorming like this. E.g.
> Jabber, or IRC, or something else.
>
> What are opinions?

I'm willing to try anything if people who know about it want to make a
decision. However, every new technology comes with its own set of
problems ;-/

-- 
David Abrahams
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution