From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-15 10:19:03
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > Of course, "bjam" run takes more time
>> It's slower than v1? Or does it take more time than something else?
> Slower than v1.
> It's not surprising, given all the features that we want.
It surprises me a little, since the architecture of v1 lends itself to
so many inefficiencies.
> When feature set is more or less complete, we'd have to optimize it.
I can help there.
>> > but the switch to shared libs seem to save time and space.
>> > (e.g. 3M vs. 37 M)
>> Time and space during the build process, or in your project overall?
> Space In the built project. And time during build.
That's really great! Well, of course it saves some link time during
the build. It'd be nice if we could save more time during the bjam
processing. Well, there's still time to do that.
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk