|
Boost-Build :
|
- Next message: Felix E. Klee: "Re: [jamboost] Re: Actions get called twice with Boost Jam"
- Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Shared libraries on OpenBSD..."
- Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [jamboost] Re: [Boost-build] CVS: boost/tools/build/new sequence.jam,1.10,1.11 property.jam,1.22,1.23 gcc.jam,1.17,1.18 feature.jam,1.25,1.26 build-request.jam,1.14,1.15"
- Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [jamboost] Re: [Boost-build] CVS: boost/tools/build/new sequence.jam,1.10,1.11 property.jam,1.22,1.23 gcc.jam,1.17,1.18 feature.jam,1.25,1.26 build-request.jam,1.14,1.15"
David Abrahams wrote:
> @@ -148,10 +168,13 @@
> # return the implicit feature associated with the given implicit value.
> rule implied-feature ( implicit-value )
> {
> - local feature = $($(implicit-value).implicit-feature) ;
> + local components = [ regex.split $(implicit-value) "-" ] ;
> +
> + local feature = $($(components[1]).implicit-feature) ;
> if ! $(feature)
> {
> error \"$(implicit-value)\" is not a value of an implicit feature ;
> + feature = "" ;
Why is this assignment necessary?
- Volodya
- Next message: Felix E. Klee: "Re: [jamboost] Re: Actions get called twice with Boost Jam"
- Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Shared libraries on OpenBSD..."
- Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [jamboost] Re: [Boost-build] CVS: boost/tools/build/new sequence.jam,1.10,1.11 property.jam,1.22,1.23 gcc.jam,1.17,1.18 feature.jam,1.25,1.26 build-request.jam,1.14,1.15"
- Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [jamboost] Re: [Boost-build] CVS: boost/tools/build/new sequence.jam,1.10,1.11 property.jam,1.22,1.23 gcc.jam,1.17,1.18 feature.jam,1.25,1.26 build-request.jam,1.14,1.15"
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk