From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-15 07:35:39
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>>It *is* the coolness. However, I'm a bit surprised it worked, since
>>>>the whole reason I changed gcc.jam was that it was still reporting
>>>><toolset-version> as invalid.
>>>I though that your intention was not to make <toolset-version>
>> I didn't have that specific intention in mind. I do worry that if
>> <toolset-version> remains invalid, it's going to come back and bite us
> Hmm.. I recall you were saying <toolset-version> is not for users to
> specify. Did you change your mind?
Not sure whether I meant that I wanted to prohibit it, or just that
they were unlikely to specify it. The latter seems more likely.
However, what I'm concerned about is that some of our code will do
validation after expansion, and that shouldn't cause an error.
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk