From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-15 08:07:30
David Abrahams wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>I bet this is about extensions again. Maybe we ought to fix the test
>>>framework to auto-adjust extensions it sees based on the platform?
>>No, it's about "aux"! I don't know what device it is, but it's certainly
>>some reserved device name on Win32. Do an update and try again. It passes
>>for me on Win2000.
> Anyway, do you have any thoughts about my idea?
Hmm... I thought it's hard, but it isn't, in fact. We'd specify everything
for Win32/gcc. The framework can adjust extensions automatically.
We cannot specify everything for Linux/gcc because executable files has
no extension there, and we cannot tell them from other files without
How does it look?
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk