Re: [jamboost] Re: tooset flags problem

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-15 08:07:30

David Abrahams wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> 
>>>I bet this is about extensions again. Maybe we ought to fix the test
>>>framework to auto-adjust extensions it sees based on the platform?
>>
>>No, it's about "aux"! I don't know what device it is, but it's certainly
>>some reserved device name on Win32. Do an update and try again. It passes
>>for me on Win2000.
> 
> 
> Anyway, do you have any thoughts about my idea?

Hmm... I thought it's hard, but it isn't, in fact. We'd specify everything
for Win32/gcc. The framework can adjust extensions automatically.

We cannot specify everything for Linux/gcc because executable files has
no extension there, and we cannot tell them from other files without
extension.

How does it look?

- Volodya