From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-15 09:31:33
David Abrahams wrote:
>>Hmm... I thought it's hard, but it isn't, in fact. We'd specify everything
>>for Win32/gcc. The framework can adjust extensions automatically.
>>We cannot specify everything for Linux/gcc because executable files has
>>no extension there, and we cannot tell them from other files without
> I had the same thought. On the other hand we could just say that by
> convention we don't use files without an extension unless they are
I don't have a strong opinion.
>>How does it look?
> That sounds like a good plan.
OK, added to my todo. However, I plan to try QT with V2 first,
as asked by Felix, so feel free to grab this task.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk