Re: [jamboost] Adding QT support to Boost Build V2

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-16 08:29:34

David Abrahams wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> 
>>No, the F -> OBJ transformation will be added, and you'll write
>>
>> qt.exe heloo : hello.cpp hello.f hello.h ;
> 
> 
> This confuses me every time I see it, because it looks like we're
> describing an executable called "qt". 

True. Never noticed it.

> I wonder if we shouldn't go
> with names like "program" and "library" for these top-level rules.
> They certainly would be more explicit and less platform-specific
> sounding. 

I'd rather not change anything. "exe" and "lib" are short and I'm accustomed 
to it. Were there any complaints?

- Volodya