Re: [jamboost] QT support, and some problems

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-20 09:05:50

Felix E. Klee wrote:
> On Monday 20 January 2003 02:07 pm, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> 
>>>>Done. examples-v2/qt now uses "h" suffix.
>>>
>>>Thanks! Could you also make it customizable? The problem is that I
>>>sometimes actually use "hpp" as suffixes for files to be moc'ed. It would
>>>be great if one could specify several suffixes, but that's not absolutely
>>>neccesary.
>>
>>I'm not sure that complete customization is indeed necessary. So far, I've
>>added "hpp" as another extension for "H" target type. This will allow you
>>to use both h and hpp in QT project.
> 
> 
> That's fine. I'll try that out this evening. BTW, do you plan to add uic 
> support anytime soon? Then, AFAICS, Boost Build can be used as a complete 
> replacement for qmake.

I've no practical experience with UIC. If you can add small UIC example to 
examples-v2/qt to play with, I can try to add UIC support to Boost.Build.

- Volodya